<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AP Editor: Sotomayor Used &#8216;Pro-Choice&#8217; Language (As Does the AP)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aul.org/2009/07/14/ap-editor-sotomayor-used-pro-choice-language-as-does-the-ap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/07/14/ap-editor-sotomayor-used-pro-choice-language-as-does-the-ap/</link>
	<description>Changing Law to Protect Human Life, State by State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:17:03 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AP Editor: Sotomayor Used ‘Pro-Choice’ Language (As Does the AP) &#124; Pelican Project Pro-Life</title>
		<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/07/14/ap-editor-sotomayor-used-pro-choice-language-as-does-the-ap/comment-page-1/#comment-2506</link>
		<dc:creator>AP Editor: Sotomayor Used ‘Pro-Choice’ Language (As Does the AP) &#124; Pelican Project Pro-Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aul.org/?p=452#comment-2506</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more: AP Editor: Sotomayor Used ‘Pro-Choice’ Language (As Does the AP) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more: AP Editor: Sotomayor Used ‘Pro-Choice’ Language (As Does the AP) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DPierre</title>
		<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/07/14/ap-editor-sotomayor-used-pro-choice-language-as-does-the-ap/comment-page-1/#comment-2505</link>
		<dc:creator>DPierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aul.org/?p=452#comment-2505</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a HILARIOUS example of how a copy editor at the LA Times took its pro-life/anti-abortion labelling a bit too far:
http://www.themediareport.com/jul2004/antiabortionopera.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a HILARIOUS example of how a copy editor at the LA Times took its pro-life/anti-abortion labelling a bit too far:<br />
<a href="http://www.themediareport.com/jul2004/antiabortionopera.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.themediareport.com/jul2004/antiabortionopera.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D------</title>
		<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/07/14/ap-editor-sotomayor-used-pro-choice-language-as-does-the-ap/comment-page-1/#comment-2501</link>
		<dc:creator>D------</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aul.org/?p=452#comment-2501</guid>
		<description>I had a writing job once with a publishing company. We had an in-house style manual which spelled out terms clearly (i.e. the correct term is &quot;country-and-western,&quot; not &quot;country-western&quot;). One entry was &quot;pro-life (do not use).&quot; It didn&#039;t explain why.

I used it anyway in my articles, and my liberal editors didn&#039;t correct it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a writing job once with a publishing company. We had an in-house style manual which spelled out terms clearly (i.e. the correct term is &#8220;country-and-western,&#8221; not &#8220;country-western&#8221;). One entry was &#8220;pro-life (do not use).&#8221; It didn&#8217;t explain why.</p>
<p>I used it anyway in my articles, and my liberal editors didn&#8217;t correct it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
