<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Federal Courts Have Commonly Read Abortion Into Medicaid’s ‘Mandatory Categories’</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aul.org/2009/09/08/federal-courts-have-commonly-read-abortion-into-medicaid%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98mandatory-categories%e2%80%99/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/09/08/federal-courts-have-commonly-read-abortion-into-medicaid%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98mandatory-categories%e2%80%99/</link>
	<description>Changing Law to Protect Human Life, State by State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:17:03 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AUL&#8217;s Statement in Response to President Obama&#8217;s Address</title>
		<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/09/08/federal-courts-have-commonly-read-abortion-into-medicaid%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98mandatory-categories%e2%80%99/comment-page-1/#comment-2756</link>
		<dc:creator>AUL&#8217;s Statement in Response to President Obama&#8217;s Address</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 01:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aul.org/?p=557#comment-2756</guid>
		<description>[...] taxpayer funding of abortion.  They also documented how seven circuit courts have held that abortion is covered under Medicaid, necessitating an explicit prohibition on the inclusion of abortion.  Dr. Yoest stated that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] taxpayer funding of abortion.  They also documented how seven circuit courts have held that abortion is covered under Medicaid, necessitating an explicit prohibition on the inclusion of abortion.  Dr. Yoest stated that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leading Pro-Life Group’s “Back to the Hill” Health Care Campaign</title>
		<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/09/08/federal-courts-have-commonly-read-abortion-into-medicaid%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98mandatory-categories%e2%80%99/comment-page-1/#comment-2754</link>
		<dc:creator>Leading Pro-Life Group’s “Back to the Hill” Health Care Campaign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aul.org/?p=557#comment-2754</guid>
		<description>[...] Federal Courts on Abortion and Medicaid Coverage [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Federal Courts on Abortion and Medicaid Coverage [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Abortion Mandate ? &#171; Saynsumthn&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/09/08/federal-courts-have-commonly-read-abortion-into-medicaid%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98mandatory-categories%e2%80%99/comment-page-1/#comment-2747</link>
		<dc:creator>No Abortion Mandate ? &#171; Saynsumthn&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aul.org/?p=557#comment-2747</guid>
		<description>[...] No Abortion Mandate&#160;?  Federal Courts Have Commonly Read Abortion Into Medicaid’s ‘Mandatory Categories’ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No Abortion Mandate&nbsp;?  Federal Courts Have Commonly Read Abortion Into Medicaid’s ‘Mandatory Categories’ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
