<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prez Nominates Pro-Abort ACLU Lawyer to EEOC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aul.org/2009/10/23/prez-nominates-pro-abort-aclu-lawyer-to-eeoc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/10/23/prez-nominates-pro-abort-aclu-lawyer-to-eeoc/</link>
	<description>Changing Law to Protect Human Life, State by State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:07:28 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/10/23/prez-nominates-pro-abort-aclu-lawyer-to-eeoc/comment-page-1/#comment-3455</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 05:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aul.org/?p=859#comment-3455</guid>
		<description>True.  God has no religion.  
God Is.
And what&#039;s more:
Life is the Light of men.
Life is the Word of God.

But it&#039;s only the Word of God,  
J 1:1-4 in His Book of outdated Laws. 

If only Feldblum could find a legal basis for her eloquent lapse, would she tell us precisely which law comes in support of her case?

Because if she doesn&#039;t, then she is blatantly unconstitutional.  Or should we say anti-constitutional?  

May we remind this lawyer that:
For Us, The American People, the First Book of Laws, after The Bible is The American Constitution, as handed down by it&#039;s Founders. 
So Help Us God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True.  God has no religion.<br />
God Is.<br />
And what&#8217;s more:<br />
Life is the Light of men.<br />
Life is the Word of God.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s only the Word of God,<br />
J 1:1-4 in His Book of outdated Laws. </p>
<p>If only Feldblum could find a legal basis for her eloquent lapse, would she tell us precisely which law comes in support of her case?</p>
<p>Because if she doesn&#8217;t, then she is blatantly unconstitutional.  Or should we say anti-constitutional?  </p>
<p>May we remind this lawyer that:<br />
For Us, The American People, the First Book of Laws, after The Bible is The American Constitution, as handed down by it&#8217;s Founders.<br />
So Help Us God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prez Nominates Pro-Abort ACLU Lawyer to EEOC &#124; Pelican Project Pro-Life</title>
		<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/10/23/prez-nominates-pro-abort-aclu-lawyer-to-eeoc/comment-page-1/#comment-3245</link>
		<dc:creator>Prez Nominates Pro-Abort ACLU Lawyer to EEOC &#124; Pelican Project Pro-Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aul.org/?p=859#comment-3245</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post: Prez Nominates Pro-Abort ACLU Lawyer to EEOC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post: Prez Nominates Pro-Abort ACLU Lawyer to EEOC [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
