<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reid Releases Pro-Abortion Health Care Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aul.org/2009/11/19/reid-releases-pro-abortion-health-care-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/11/19/reid-releases-pro-abortion-health-care-bill/</link>
	<description>Changing Law to Protect Human Life, State by State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:17:03 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maguire</title>
		<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/11/19/reid-releases-pro-abortion-health-care-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-5354</link>
		<dc:creator>Maguire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aul.org/?p=1056#comment-5354</guid>
		<description>People on both sides of this debate seem to continually miss the point of the debate, and to be ageist for moment, they forget the younger generation completely. The old are the ones who have the greatest voting power and who are the most engaged in this issue. So many of them don&#039;t want to have to pay anything that doesn&#039;t benefit them directly, but by ignoring this bill and trying to wipe it under the rug, they in turn are denying themselves potential savings as well. The plan is looking to regulate existing private insurance to stop denying claims and actually stabilize deductibles, while the public option, note the word &quot;option&quot;, would simply offer a plan to those who cannot afford any insurance.
I found an article that really gave good insight into the current debate. It was written by doctors and medical professionals, and just delivers some good facts and statistics about health care.
http://www.ourblook.com/component/option,com_sectionex/Itemid,200076/id,8/view,category/#catid107
There are so many aspects that need to changed, but everyone needs to look outside of their own bubble first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People on both sides of this debate seem to continually miss the point of the debate, and to be ageist for moment, they forget the younger generation completely. The old are the ones who have the greatest voting power and who are the most engaged in this issue. So many of them don&#8217;t want to have to pay anything that doesn&#8217;t benefit them directly, but by ignoring this bill and trying to wipe it under the rug, they in turn are denying themselves potential savings as well. The plan is looking to regulate existing private insurance to stop denying claims and actually stabilize deductibles, while the public option, note the word &#8220;option&#8221;, would simply offer a plan to those who cannot afford any insurance.<br />
I found an article that really gave good insight into the current debate. It was written by doctors and medical professionals, and just delivers some good facts and statistics about health care.<br />
<a href="http://www.ourblook.com/component/option,com_sectionex/Itemid,200076/id,8/view,category/#catid107" rel="nofollow">http://www.ourblook.com/component/option,com_sectionex/Itemid,200076/id,8/view,category/#catid107</a><br />
There are so many aspects that need to changed, but everyone needs to look outside of their own bubble first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy</title>
		<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/11/19/reid-releases-pro-abortion-health-care-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-5090</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aul.org/?p=1056#comment-5090</guid>
		<description>I am under the understanding that the original health care bill would &quot;not fund&quot; abortions.  Is this correct or incorrect.  Please refer me to exact pages in the bill that would answer this question, so I can read it, in the bill, myself.  Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am under the understanding that the original health care bill would &#8220;not fund&#8221; abortions.  Is this correct or incorrect.  Please refer me to exact pages in the bill that would answer this question, so I can read it, in the bill, myself.  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timeline: Abortion in the U.S. Senate Health Care Bill</title>
		<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/11/19/reid-releases-pro-abortion-health-care-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-5036</link>
		<dc:creator>Timeline: Abortion in the U.S. Senate Health Care Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aul.org/?p=1056#comment-5036</guid>
		<description>[...] Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) unveiled the U.S. Senate’s health care reform bill. The bill includes pro-abortion language and mirrors the false compromise Capps Amendment from the House debate — it allows the public [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) unveiled the U.S. Senate’s health care reform bill. The bill includes pro-abortion language and mirrors the false compromise Capps Amendment from the House debate — it allows the public [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Wirth</title>
		<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/11/19/reid-releases-pro-abortion-health-care-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-4201</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Wirth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aul.org/?p=1056#comment-4201</guid>
		<description>Corporations do demonstrate the conscience of their boards and officers. Look at the philanthropy attributable to companies of all sizes. For Congress to refuse all decisions of conscience by corporations shows their ivory tower disassociation from the people of the United States of America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corporations do demonstrate the conscience of their boards and officers. Look at the philanthropy attributable to companies of all sizes. For Congress to refuse all decisions of conscience by corporations shows their ivory tower disassociation from the people of the United States of America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leading Anti-Abortion Group Vows to Vigorously Fight the Senate Health Bill — AUL Action</title>
		<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/11/19/reid-releases-pro-abortion-health-care-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-4125</link>
		<dc:creator>Leading Anti-Abortion Group Vows to Vigorously Fight the Senate Health Bill — AUL Action</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aul.org/?p=1056#comment-4125</guid>
		<description>[...] To go to AUL Actions&#8217;s analysis of the abortion-related provisions in the Senate health bill, click here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To go to AUL Actions&#8217;s analysis of the abortion-related provisions in the Senate health bill, click here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senate Poised to Advance Majority Leader Reid’s Anti-Life Bill — AUL Action</title>
		<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/11/19/reid-releases-pro-abortion-health-care-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-4100</link>
		<dc:creator>Senate Poised to Advance Majority Leader Reid’s Anti-Life Bill — AUL Action</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aul.org/?p=1056#comment-4100</guid>
		<description>[...] To go to AUL&#8217;s analysis of the abortion-related provisions in the Senate health bill, click here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To go to AUL&#8217;s analysis of the abortion-related provisions in the Senate health bill, click here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Senate Health Bill: Taxpayer Funded Abortions &#124; Conservative Principles Now</title>
		<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/11/19/reid-releases-pro-abortion-health-care-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-4091</link>
		<dc:creator>The Senate Health Bill: Taxpayer Funded Abortions &#124; Conservative Principles Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aul.org/?p=1056#comment-4091</guid>
		<description>[...] action by Congress to include elective abortion in the public option. The bill cements into law the ability of the Secretary of HHS to fund any abortions not specifically covered by the annual Hyde limitation. The Stupak-Pitts amendment, included in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] action by Congress to include elective abortion in the public option. The bill cements into law the ability of the Secretary of HHS to fund any abortions not specifically covered by the annual Hyde limitation. The Stupak-Pitts amendment, included in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne from Jeremiah Films</title>
		<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/11/19/reid-releases-pro-abortion-health-care-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-4080</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne from Jeremiah Films</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aul.org/?p=1056#comment-4080</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your post ... I&#039;ve linked to it with an excerpt from Jeremiah Films &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jeremiahfilms.com/released/WhiteHouse/Obamacare/AbortionMandate/911190414&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Stop the Obamacare Abortion Mandate&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your post &#8230; I&#8217;ve linked to it with an excerpt from Jeremiah Films <a href="http://www.jeremiahfilms.com/released/WhiteHouse/Obamacare/AbortionMandate/911190414" rel="nofollow">Stop the Obamacare Abortion Mandate</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Senate Health Bill: Taxpayer Funded Abortions &#124; Fix Health Care Policy</title>
		<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/11/19/reid-releases-pro-abortion-health-care-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-4069</link>
		<dc:creator>The Senate Health Bill: Taxpayer Funded Abortions &#124; Fix Health Care Policy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aul.org/?p=1056#comment-4069</guid>
		<description>[...] action by Congress to include elective abortion in the public option. The bill cements into law the ability of the Secretary of HHS to fund any abortions not specifically covered by the annual Hyde limitation. The Stupak-Pitts amendment, included in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] action by Congress to include elective abortion in the public option. The bill cements into law the ability of the Secretary of HHS to fund any abortions not specifically covered by the annual Hyde limitation. The Stupak-Pitts amendment, included in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Senate Health Bill: Taxpayer Funded Abortions &#187; The Foundry</title>
		<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/11/19/reid-releases-pro-abortion-health-care-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-4067</link>
		<dc:creator>The Senate Health Bill: Taxpayer Funded Abortions &#187; The Foundry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aul.org/?p=1056#comment-4067</guid>
		<description>[...] action by Congress to include elective abortion in the public option. The bill cements into law the ability of the Secretary of HHS to fund any abortions not specifically covered by the annual Hyde limitation. The Stupak-Pitts amendment, included in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] action by Congress to include elective abortion in the public option. The bill cements into law the ability of the Secretary of HHS to fund any abortions not specifically covered by the annual Hyde limitation. The Stupak-Pitts amendment, included in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Fehlig</title>
		<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/11/19/reid-releases-pro-abortion-health-care-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-4064</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Fehlig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aul.org/?p=1056#comment-4064</guid>
		<description>Obama, Reid, Polosi......pure evil and such a waste of human flesh but then what do expect from the radical anti-God, anti-USA, baby killin&#039;, pro- homosexual, socialist, liberal left? This is no longer the nation our founding fathers passed on to us, no folks, this is the &quot;new United Socialist States of America&quot;. God help us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama, Reid, Polosi&#8230;&#8230;pure evil and such a waste of human flesh but then what do expect from the radical anti-God, anti-USA, baby killin&#8217;, pro- homosexual, socialist, liberal left? This is no longer the nation our founding fathers passed on to us, no folks, this is the &#8220;new United Socialist States of America&#8221;. God help us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/11/19/reid-releases-pro-abortion-health-care-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-4063</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aul.org/?p=1056#comment-4063</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m truely surprised....I was optimistic that the Stupak-Pitts amendment would still pass, as it did in the House. This will be one hell of a debate to watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m truely surprised&#8230;.I was optimistic that the Stupak-Pitts amendment would still pass, as it did in the House. This will be one hell of a debate to watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Government &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Inside Harry Reid&#8217;s Massive Health Care Tax Plan</title>
		<link>http://blog.aul.org/2009/11/19/reid-releases-pro-abortion-health-care-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-4061</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Government &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Inside Harry Reid&#8217;s Massive Health Care Tax Plan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aul.org/?p=1056#comment-4061</guid>
		<description>[...] Hennessey: Reid&#8217;s Tax Increases Weekly Standard: 2,074 Pages of Bad Ideas AUL: Reid Releases Pro-Abortion Health Care Bill Reuters: Key Differences in Bill Times Online UK: Obama Fears Double Dip Recession WSJ: Showdown on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hennessey: Reid&#8217;s Tax Increases Weekly Standard: 2,074 Pages of Bad Ideas AUL: Reid Releases Pro-Abortion Health Care Bill Reuters: Key Differences in Bill Times Online UK: Obama Fears Double Dip Recession WSJ: Showdown on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
