http://blog.aul.org/2009/12/08/summary-of-nelson-hatch-amendment-and-remaining-conscience-concerns/ Changing Law to Protect Human Life, State by State Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:17:03 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://blog.aul.org/2009/12/08/summary-of-nelson-hatch-amendment-and-remaining-conscience-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-5356 Life Concerns in Senate Health Care Reform Bill Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:34:39 +0000 http://blog.aul.org/?p=1160#comment-5356 [...] On December 8, 2009, the Senate voted to table the Nelson-Hatch-Casey amendment that would have stricken the Capps language from the Senate bill and added language mirroring the Stupak-Pitts amendment in the House.  For more information on the Nelson-Hatch-Casey amendment, please see the Summary of the Nelson-Hatch-Casey Amendment. [...] [...] On December 8, 2009, the Senate voted to table the Nelson-Hatch-Casey amendment that would have stricken the Capps language from the Senate bill and added language mirroring the Stupak-Pitts amendment in the House.  For more information on the Nelson-Hatch-Casey amendment, please see the Summary of the Nelson-Hatch-Casey Amendment. [...]

]]> http://blog.aul.org/2009/12/08/summary-of-nelson-hatch-amendment-and-remaining-conscience-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-5184 Nulono Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:29:51 +0000 http://blog.aul.org/?p=1160#comment-5184 Why must we codify into law that a human being is less valuable based on the circumstances of his or her conception? Why must we codify into law that a human being is less valuable based on the circumstances of his or her conception?

]]>